The Spaulding Group
Call Now: 732-873-5700
Menu
  • GIPS
    • What Our Clients Say
    • GIPS 101
    • What is GIPS Verification?
    • GIPS Support/Pre-Verification
    • GIPS Verification Services
    • Non-GIPS Verification
    • GIPS For Asset Owners
    • Can OCIOs Be GIPS Compliant
  • Services
    • Consulting
      • Technology Consulting
      • Operations Review
    • Training
      • Fundamentals of Investment Performance Measurement
      • Performance Measurement Attribution
      • GIPS Workshop
      • In-House/Custom Training
      • Portfolio Risk Class
      • Performance Measurement for the Non-Performance Professional
      • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR ASSET OWNERS AND CONSULTANTS
    • Software Certification
    • Vendor Support
      • Marketing Support
      • System Consulting
    • Publishing
    • Research
  • Products
    • The Journal
      • Media Kit
      • Article Submissions
      • Past Articles of The Journal of Performance Measurement
      • Dietz Award Winners
  • Conferences and Forums
    • Conferences
      • Virtual PMAR Web-Conference
      • PMAR North America
      • PMAR Europe
      • PMAR West
      • Performance Jeopardy Champions
      • Web Conferences
    • Performance Measurement Forum
    • Asset Owner Roundtable
  • Investment Performance Guy Blog
    • CIPM Tips & Tricks
    • Resource Center
  • About Us
    • TSG In The News
    • The Company
    • Awards and Recognition
    • Our Story
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • GIPS
    • What Our Clients Say
    • GIPS 101
    • What is GIPS Verification?
    • GIPS Support/Pre-Verification
    • GIPS Verification Services
    • Non-GIPS Verification
    • GIPS For Asset Owners
    • Can OCIOs Be GIPS Compliant
  • Services
    • Consulting
      • Technology Consulting
      • Operations Review
    • Training
      • Fundamentals of Investment Performance Measurement
      • Performance Measurement Attribution
      • GIPS Workshop
      • In-House/Custom Training
      • Portfolio Risk Class
      • Performance Measurement for the Non-Performance Professional
      • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR ASSET OWNERS AND CONSULTANTS
    • Software Certification
    • Vendor Support
      • Marketing Support
      • System Consulting
    • Publishing
    • Research
  • Products
    • The Journal
      • Media Kit
      • Article Submissions
      • Past Articles of The Journal of Performance Measurement
      • Dietz Award Winners
  • Conferences and Forums
    • Conferences
      • Virtual PMAR Web-Conference
      • PMAR North America
      • PMAR Europe
      • PMAR West
      • Performance Jeopardy Champions
      • Web Conferences
    • Performance Measurement Forum
    • Asset Owner Roundtable
  • Investment Performance Guy Blog
    • CIPM Tips & Tricks
    • Resource Center
  • About Us
    • TSG In The News
    • The Company
    • Awards and Recognition
    • Our Story
    • Careers
  • Contact
Search the site...
Home» Product » Geometric Attribution and the Interaction Effect

Geometric Attribution and the Interaction Effect

Posted by spaulding - November 1, 2018 -
0

$25.00

In this paper, we show that, despite this belief, an interaction effect does arise when the BKT method is directly derived from the arithmetic Brinson and Fachler (BF) method.

Category: Articles
  • Description

Description

Geometric Attribution and the Interaction Effect
Arno E. Weber, CIPM

It is often assumed by practitioners in the field of investment performance attribution that the geometric attribution method developed by Burnie, Knowles and Teder (BKT) is interaction-free. That is, the method explains excess return by allocation and selection effects, without the need for an interaction effect. In this paper, we show that, despite this belief, an interaction effect does arise when the BKT method is directly derived from the arithmetic Brinson and Fachler (BF) method. We present this derivation, offering a variant of the BKT method which features an interaction effect and, in line with BF, a selection effect which is independent of the allocation decisions (and
vice versa). Finally, we show that in the newly introduced BKT variant, an interaction effect does not only occur within each individual market segment, but also between segments. This results in an additional cross-segment interaction effect, which is not present in the arithmetic BF method.

Related products

  • erformance measurement big

    A Case for Fixed Income Holdings-Based Attribution: Techniques for Achieving Cleaner Results

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • Performance Measurement

    A General Approach for Linking Arithmetic Attribution Results Over Time

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • A Critical Analysis of Fund Rating Systems

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • Performance Measurement

    A Framework for Multiple Currency Fixed Income Attribution

    $25.00
    Add to cart

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy Policy   Terms and Conditions
Copyright 2018-2019. The Spaulding Group.
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
CFA Institute does not endorse, promote or warrant the accuracy or quality of The Spaulding Group, Inc. GIPS® is a registered trademark owned by CFA Institute.
 
This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. If you continue to browse the site, it indicates you accept our use of cookies.Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
Necessary
Always Enabled