$25.00
This paper looks to evolve arithmetic performance attribution from three ideas. First, the total weight associated with stock selection effect should exclude the asset allocation decision. Second, the assessment of an asset allocation decision should consider the actual returns connected to that decision. Third, excess return decomposition should exclude the impact of overlapping issue-level positions. From these ideas, this paper presents three modifications to the Brinson-Fachler model. These changes yield an attribution model that is more suitable for exploratory portfolio analysis. This evolved model is void of interaction effects, functionally symmetric with respect to data inputs, and designed to generate consistent attribution effects.
Mike Canty, CFA, Capital Group Companies
Description
This paper looks to evolve arithmetic performance attribution from three ideas. First, the total weight associated with stock selection effect should exclude the asset allocation decision. Second, the assessment of an asset allocation decision should consider the actual returns connected to that decision. Third, excess return decomposition should exclude the impact of overlapping issue-level positions. From these ideas, this paper presents three modifications to the Brinson-Fachler model. These changes yield an attribution model that is more suitable for exploratory portfolio analysis. This evolved model is void of interaction effects, functionally symmetric with respect to data inputs, and designed to generate consistent attribution effects.
Mike Canty, CFA, Capital Group Companies
Related products
-
A Consistent Linking Concept for Fast Calculations of the Rate of Return and Research of Investment
$25.00 Add to cart -
A Modest Proposal to Modernize the Performance Evaluation of Hedge Funds
$25.00 Add to cart -
A Comparison of GIPS and the AIMR-PPS
$5.00 Add to cart -
A Geometric Methodology for Performance Attribution
$25.00 Add to cart