The Spaulding Group
Call Now: 732-873-5700
Menu
  • GIPS
    • What Our Clients Say
    • GIPS 101
    • What is GIPS Verification?
    • GIPS Support/Pre-Verification
    • GIPS Verification Services
    • Non-GIPS Verification
    • GIPS For Asset Owners
    • Can OCIOs Be GIPS Compliant
  • Services
    • Consulting
      • Technology Consulting
      • Operations Review
    • Training
      • Fundamentals of Investment Performance Measurement
      • Performance Measurement Attribution
      • GIPS Workshop
      • In-House/Custom Training
      • Portfolio Risk Class
      • Performance Measurement for the Non-Performance Professional
      • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR ASSET OWNERS AND CONSULTANTS
    • Software Certification
    • Vendor Support
      • Marketing Support
      • System Consulting
    • Publishing
    • Research
  • Products
    • The Journal
      • Media Kit
      • Article Submissions
      • Past Articles of The Journal of Performance Measurement
      • Dietz Award Winners
  • Conferences and Forums
    • Conferences
      • Virtual PMAR Web-Conference
      • PMAR North America
      • PMAR Europe
      • PMAR West
      • Performance Jeopardy Champions
      • Web Conferences
    • Performance Measurement Forum
    • Asset Owner Roundtable
  • Investment Performance Guy Blog
    • CIPM Tips & Tricks
    • Resource Center
  • About Us
    • TSG In The News
    • The Company
    • Awards and Recognition
    • Our Story
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • GIPS
    • What Our Clients Say
    • GIPS 101
    • What is GIPS Verification?
    • GIPS Support/Pre-Verification
    • GIPS Verification Services
    • Non-GIPS Verification
    • GIPS For Asset Owners
    • Can OCIOs Be GIPS Compliant
  • Services
    • Consulting
      • Technology Consulting
      • Operations Review
    • Training
      • Fundamentals of Investment Performance Measurement
      • Performance Measurement Attribution
      • GIPS Workshop
      • In-House/Custom Training
      • Portfolio Risk Class
      • Performance Measurement for the Non-Performance Professional
      • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR ASSET OWNERS AND CONSULTANTS
    • Software Certification
    • Vendor Support
      • Marketing Support
      • System Consulting
    • Publishing
    • Research
  • Products
    • The Journal
      • Media Kit
      • Article Submissions
      • Past Articles of The Journal of Performance Measurement
      • Dietz Award Winners
  • Conferences and Forums
    • Conferences
      • Virtual PMAR Web-Conference
      • PMAR North America
      • PMAR Europe
      • PMAR West
      • Performance Jeopardy Champions
      • Web Conferences
    • Performance Measurement Forum
    • Asset Owner Roundtable
  • Investment Performance Guy Blog
    • CIPM Tips & Tricks
    • Resource Center
  • About Us
    • TSG In The News
    • The Company
    • Awards and Recognition
    • Our Story
    • Careers
  • Contact
Search the site...
Home» Product » Evolving Performance Attribution to Support Exploratory Excess Return Decomposition

Evolving Performance Attribution to Support Exploratory Excess Return Decomposition

Posted by spaulding - April 27, 2018 -
0

$25.00

This paper looks to evolve arithmetic performance attribution from three ideas. First, the total weight associated with stock selection effect should exclude the asset allocation decision. Second, the assessment of an asset allocation decision should consider the actual returns connected to that decision. Third, excess return decomposition should exclude the impact of overlapping issue-level positions. From these ideas, this paper presents three modifications to the Brinson-Fachler model. These changes yield an attribution model that is more suitable for exploratory portfolio analysis. This evolved model is void of interaction effects, functionally symmetric with respect to data inputs, and designed to generate consistent attribution effects.

Mike Canty, CFA, Capital Group Companies

Categories: Articles, Journal
  • Description

Description

This paper looks to evolve arithmetic performance attribution from three ideas. First, the total weight associated with stock selection effect should exclude the asset allocation decision. Second, the assessment of an asset allocation decision should consider the actual returns connected to that decision. Third, excess return decomposition should exclude the impact of overlapping issue-level positions. From these ideas, this paper presents three modifications to the Brinson-Fachler model. These changes yield an attribution model that is more suitable for exploratory portfolio analysis. This evolved model is void of interaction effects, functionally symmetric with respect to data inputs, and designed to generate consistent attribution effects.

Mike Canty, CFA, Capital Group Companies

Related products

  • Performance Measurement

    A Consistent Linking Concept for Fast Calculations of the Rate of Return and Research of Investment

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • Performance Measurement

    A Modest Proposal to Modernize the Performance Evaluation of Hedge Funds

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • Performance Measurement

    A Comparison of GIPS and the AIMR-PPS

    $5.00
    Add to cart
  • Performance Measurement

    A Geometric Methodology for Performance Attribution

    $25.00
    Add to cart

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy Policy   Terms and Conditions
Copyright 2018-2019. The Spaulding Group.
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
CFA Institute does not endorse, promote or warrant the accuracy or quality of The Spaulding Group, Inc. GIPS® is a registered trademark owned by CFA Institute.
 
This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. If you continue to browse the site, it indicates you accept our use of cookies.Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
Necessary
Always Enabled