The Spaulding Group
Call Now: 732-873-5700
Menu
  • GIPS
    • What Our Clients Say
    • GIPS 101
    • What is GIPS Verification?
    • GIPS Support/Pre-Verification
    • GIPS Verification Services
    • Non-GIPS Verification
    • GIPS For Asset Owners
    • Can OCIOs Be GIPS Compliant
  • Services
    • Consulting
      • Technology Consulting
      • Operations Review
    • Training
      • Fundamentals of Investment Performance Measurement
      • Performance Measurement Attribution
      • GIPS Workshop
      • In-House/Custom Training
      • Portfolio Risk Class
      • Performance Measurement for the Non-Performance Professional
      • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR ASSET OWNERS AND CONSULTANTS
    • Software Certification
    • Vendor Support
      • Marketing Support
      • System Consulting
    • Publishing
    • Research
  • Products
    • The Journal
      • Media Kit
      • Article Submissions
      • Past Articles of The Journal of Performance Measurement
      • Dietz Award Winners
  • Conferences and Forums
    • Conferences
      • Virtual PMAR Web-Conference
      • PMAR North America
      • PMAR Europe
      • PMAR West
      • Performance Jeopardy Champions
      • Web Conferences
    • Performance Measurement Forum
    • Asset Owner Roundtable
  • Investment Performance Guy Blog
    • CIPM Tips & Tricks
    • Resource Center
  • About Us
    • TSG In The News
    • The Company
    • Awards and Recognition
    • Our Story
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • GIPS
    • What Our Clients Say
    • GIPS 101
    • What is GIPS Verification?
    • GIPS Support/Pre-Verification
    • GIPS Verification Services
    • Non-GIPS Verification
    • GIPS For Asset Owners
    • Can OCIOs Be GIPS Compliant
  • Services
    • Consulting
      • Technology Consulting
      • Operations Review
    • Training
      • Fundamentals of Investment Performance Measurement
      • Performance Measurement Attribution
      • GIPS Workshop
      • In-House/Custom Training
      • Portfolio Risk Class
      • Performance Measurement for the Non-Performance Professional
      • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR ASSET OWNERS AND CONSULTANTS
    • Software Certification
    • Vendor Support
      • Marketing Support
      • System Consulting
    • Publishing
    • Research
  • Products
    • The Journal
      • Media Kit
      • Article Submissions
      • Past Articles of The Journal of Performance Measurement
      • Dietz Award Winners
  • Conferences and Forums
    • Conferences
      • Virtual PMAR Web-Conference
      • PMAR North America
      • PMAR Europe
      • PMAR West
      • Performance Jeopardy Champions
      • Web Conferences
    • Performance Measurement Forum
    • Asset Owner Roundtable
  • Investment Performance Guy Blog
    • CIPM Tips & Tricks
    • Resource Center
  • About Us
    • TSG In The News
    • The Company
    • Awards and Recognition
    • Our Story
    • Careers
  • Contact
Search the site...
Home» Product » The Case for Money-weighted Performance Attribution

The Case for Money-weighted Performance Attribution

Posted by admin - May 18, 2014 -
0

$25.00

This paper proposes that, while there is an irrefutable case for accepting the time-weighted return as the preferred method for measuring the return of an investment manager, there is an equally compelling case for accepting the money-weighted return as the appropriate method for evaluating the source of that active return; that is, that the money-weighted return is the correct method for performance attribution.

Author: Stephen Campisi

SKU: Spring20048-3-3 Category: Articles Tag: Performance Attribution
  • Description

Description

Performance attribution has evolved in parallel with performance measurement by accepting the time-weighted return as the preferred calculation method.  In addition, the investment industry has accepted the assumption that increasing the frequency of calculation leads to improved accuracy in both the calculation and attribution of return.  These assumptions have led to the wholesale abandonment of the money-weighted return calculation, both for performance measurement and performance attribution.  This paper proposes that, while there is an irrefutable case for accepting the time-weighted return as the preferred method for measuring the return of an investment manager, there is an equally compelling case for accepting the money-weighted return as the appropriate method for evaluating the source of that active return; that is, that the money-weighted return is the correct method for performance attribution.

Related products

  • Performance Measurement

    A Hierarchy of Methods for Calculating Rates of Return

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • A Critical Analysis of Fund Rating Systems

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • Performance Measurement

    A General Approach for Linking Arithmetic Attribution Results Over Time

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • erformance measurement big

    A Case for Fixed Income Holdings-Based Attribution: Techniques for Achieving Cleaner Results

    $25.00
    Add to cart

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy Policy   Terms and Conditions
Copyright 2018-2019. The Spaulding Group.
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
CFA Institute does not endorse, promote or warrant the accuracy or quality of The Spaulding Group, Inc. GIPS® is a registered trademark owned by CFA Institute.
 
This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. If you continue to browse the site, it indicates you accept our use of cookies.Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
Necessary
Always Enabled