The Spaulding Group
Call Now: 732-873-5700
Menu
  • GIPS
    • What Our Clients Say
    • GIPS 101
    • What is GIPS Verification?
    • GIPS Support/Pre-Verification
    • GIPS Verification Services
    • Non-GIPS Verification
    • GIPS For Asset Owners
    • Can OCIOs Be GIPS Compliant
  • Services
    • Consulting
      • Technology Consulting
      • Operations Review
    • Training
      • Fundamentals of Investment Performance Measurement
      • Performance Measurement Attribution
      • GIPS Workshop
      • In-House/Custom Training
      • Portfolio Risk Class
      • Performance Measurement for the Non-Performance Professional
      • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR ASSET OWNERS AND CONSULTANTS
    • Software Certification
    • Vendor Support
      • Marketing Support
      • System Consulting
    • Publishing
    • Research
  • Products
    • The Journal
      • Media Kit
      • Article Submissions
      • Past Articles of The Journal of Performance Measurement
      • Dietz Award Winners
  • Conferences and Forums
    • Conferences
      • Virtual PMAR Web-Conference
      • PMAR North America
      • PMAR Europe
      • PMAR West
      • Performance Jeopardy Champions
      • Web Conferences
    • Performance Measurement Forum
    • Asset Owner Roundtable
  • Investment Performance Guy Blog
    • CIPM Tips & Tricks
    • Resource Center
  • About Us
    • TSG In The News
    • The Company
    • Awards and Recognition
    • Our Story
    • Careers
  • Contact
  • GIPS
    • What Our Clients Say
    • GIPS 101
    • What is GIPS Verification?
    • GIPS Support/Pre-Verification
    • GIPS Verification Services
    • Non-GIPS Verification
    • GIPS For Asset Owners
    • Can OCIOs Be GIPS Compliant
  • Services
    • Consulting
      • Technology Consulting
      • Operations Review
    • Training
      • Fundamentals of Investment Performance Measurement
      • Performance Measurement Attribution
      • GIPS Workshop
      • In-House/Custom Training
      • Portfolio Risk Class
      • Performance Measurement for the Non-Performance Professional
      • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FOR ASSET OWNERS AND CONSULTANTS
    • Software Certification
    • Vendor Support
      • Marketing Support
      • System Consulting
    • Publishing
    • Research
  • Products
    • The Journal
      • Media Kit
      • Article Submissions
      • Past Articles of The Journal of Performance Measurement
      • Dietz Award Winners
  • Conferences and Forums
    • Conferences
      • Virtual PMAR Web-Conference
      • PMAR North America
      • PMAR Europe
      • PMAR West
      • Performance Jeopardy Champions
      • Web Conferences
    • Performance Measurement Forum
    • Asset Owner Roundtable
  • Investment Performance Guy Blog
    • CIPM Tips & Tricks
    • Resource Center
  • About Us
    • TSG In The News
    • The Company
    • Awards and Recognition
    • Our Story
    • Careers
  • Contact
Search the site...
Home» Product » Active Managers Without Complete Discretion: A Case Study Using Extensions of Various Attribution Models

Active Managers Without Complete Discretion: A Case Study Using Extensions of Various Attribution Models

Posted by spaulding - December 31, 2019 -
0

$25.00

Active Managers Without Complete Discretion: A Case Study Using Extensions of Various Attribution Models
Ted Heemskerk, CQF, FRM, De Nederlandsche Bank and
Gerard C. M. van Breukelen, CIPM, Robeco

Monetary policy can interfere with active management at central banks, resulting in parts of the investments being frozen. To execute a proper performance attribution, the reduced decision power needs to be taken into account. In this article, we present a method to account for frozen investments in the performance attribution.

Categories: Articles, Journal
  • Description

Description

Active Managers Without Complete Discretion: A Case Study Using Extensions of Various Attribution Models
Ted Heemskerk, CQF, FRM, De Nederlandsche Bank and
Gerard C. M. van Breukelen, CIPM, Robeco

Monetary policy can interfere with active management at central banks, resulting in parts of the investments being frozen. To execute a proper performance attribution, the reduced decision power needs to be taken into account. In this article, we present a method to account for frozen investments in the performance attribution. We exemplify this method using relevant performance attribution models for reserve management portfolios. The selected models are: the Brinson model; the Karnosky and Singer model, adjusted to take into account actual hedging costs; and
the Campisi and Van Breukelen fixed-income models, because they present two alternative views on how managers allocate within the fixed-income space. The van Breukelen model is extended to show the results of spread decisions.

Related products

  • The Journal of Performance Measurement

    A General Framework for the Business Requirements of an Investment Performance Measurement System

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • Performance Measurement

    A General Approach for Linking Arithmetic Attribution Results Over Time

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • A Critical Analysis of Fund Rating Systems

    $25.00
    Add to cart
  • Performance Measurement

    A Geometric Attribution Model and a Symmetry Principle

    $25.00
    Add to cart

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Privacy Policy   Terms and Conditions
Copyright 2018-2019. The Spaulding Group.
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
CFA Institute does not endorse, promote or warrant the accuracy or quality of The Spaulding Group, Inc. GIPS® is a registered trademark owned by CFA Institute.
 
This site uses functional cookies and external scripts to improve your experience. If you continue to browse the site, it indicates you accept our use of cookies.Accept Privacy Policy
Privacy Policy
Necessary
Always Enabled